March 11, 2026

When to Pay a Premium

In M&A transactions, often times companies will try to find a deal with a lower multiple. The truth is that paying a premium for a well run business with a similar culture improves the odds of achieving the projected ROI post-acquisition.

Paying a premium for a strong, well-run business can actually be the lower-risk path.


When companies evaluate an acquisition, the discussion usually centers on the purchase price.Is the multiple reasonable? Are we paying too much?

The bigger issue is how much change the organization will need to execute after the deal closes.

Paying a premium for a strong, well-run business can actually be the lower-risk path.

The business already works. Customers are stable, and the management team knows how to run it. After closing, the job is largely to support the business and avoid disrupting what is already performing well. In short, a light touch approach.

Turnaround deals are different.

The purchase price often looks attractive because the business is underperforming. But the deal usually depends on management fixing several things in the acquired business at the same time, more like a bear hug

The harder question is who inside the acquiring organization actually owns that work, and are they adequately incentivized for the career risk they are taking

In practice, that usually means addressing issues such as:

▪️ Management capacity: Who is actually going to run the turnaround while the core business still needs attention? “We’ll just add a GM” is not a plan if incentives, authority, and support functions are unclear.

▪️ Incentives and retention: Turnarounds usually require key people to change behavior under stress. If compensation, autonomy, or culture are misaligned, the people you are relying on become a flight risk.

▪️ Integration demands: Turnarounds often involve multiple simultaneous changes. New systems, new processes, new pricing, new channel strategy, new leadership. Each one consumes management attention and usually takes longer than the model assumes.

▪️ Operating constraints: Customers, channel partners, and suppliers react to uncertainty. If the business depends on relationships, “integration” can quietly become a process of rebuilding trust while the organization is also trying to hit performance targets.

None of these changes happens in isolation. They require time, attention, and experienced leadership.

They also have to happen while the parent company continues running its core business.

This is where many turnaround deals start to run into trouble. The financial model assumes those changes will happen. Organizations often underestimate how difficult it is to execute all of them within the same period.

Before focusing too heavily on the purchase price, it is worth asking a simpler question.

How much impact on the acquiring organization will this deal require in the first 12 to 24 months, and does management actually have the bandwidth to execute it while still running the core business?

About the author

Andy Tomat

Andy Tomat

Founder

Andy Tomat is a board director and corporate development executive with more than three decades of experience guiding organizations through acquisitions, strategic growth decisions, and financial oversight across industrial technology, automation, robotics, AI, and nonprofit settings.

Related Posts

  • Smaller Deals are Not Safer

    Small deals feel safer because they look contained. But in many smaller acquisitions, value depends on improvement rather than continuity.